On Mon, 24 Nov 1997, Bill Moran wrote:
> Thanks for your help on Matlab. I have checked with ldd and have
> exactly the same libraries as others:
> libXpm.so.4 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4
> libXt.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6
> libXext.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6
> libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
> libdl.so.1 => /lib/libdl.so.1
> libg++.so.27 => /usr/lib/libg++.so.27
> libstdc++.so.27 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.27
> libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5
> libc.so.5 => /lib/libc.so.5
> libSM.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6
> libICE.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6
> I still have the same error
> /usr/local/src/matlab5/bin/lnx86/matlab: can't resolve symbol '__register_exceptions'
> Why do I want to use MATLAB5, rather than octave and scilab?
> Basically for ease of compatibility
> with others in the group I am working with. In particular,
> I need to use Simulink or
> something very compatible with it.
What exactly is Simulink? An external interface mayby? octave does have
that, though I've never used it and don't know how close it would be to
> I am not aware that Octave has anything like
> that. Scilab does, but I don't know how easy it is to port over code
> written in Scilab's version to Matlab.
>From what I have heard of Scilab, many of the functions are quite
different, having different numbers of arguments, etc. In fact the
student I know who was trying to use scilab to do his Digital Signal
Processing homework swithed to octave when I told him how well it had
worked for me. He said that individual scilab functions seemed more
powerful but also more complicated, and it wasn't always easy to figure
out how to map MATLAB functions to scilab function.
> Any more ideas on my matlab problem?
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .
- Re: Matlab5
- From: Bill Moran <email@example.com>