[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Is it possible to compile gnome-0.9 in debian with libc6?



Hi all,

I noticed that gnome_0.9-1.deb had "obgtk stuff" left out, so I try to compile
gnome from source. This is the error I got:

gcc -g -O2 -o phaser_chess board_view.o coord_list.o logical_board.o phaser-ches
s.o ../../libgnomeui/_libs/libgnomeui.a ../../libgnome/_libs/libgnome.a ../../ob
gtk/_libs/libobgtk.a -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgtk -lgdk -lglib -lX11 -lXext -lm -lobjc
 -lguile -lm -ldl
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/2.7.2.3/libobjc.a(thr-posix.o): In function `__objc_
init_thread_system':
thr-posix.o(.text+0x3b): undefined reference to `pthread_key_create'
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/2.7.2.3/libobjc.a(thr-posix.o): In function `objc_th
read_create':
thr-posix.o(.text+0x95): undefined reference to `pthread_create'
thr-posix.o(.text+0xa5): undefined reference to `pthread_detach'
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/2.7.2.3/libobjc.a(thr-posix.o): In function `objc_th
read_set_data':
thr-posix.o(.text+0x14e): undefined reference to `pthread_setspecific'
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/2.7.2.3/libobjc.a(thr-posix.o): In function `objc_th
read_get_data':
thr-posix.o(.text+0x17a): undefined reference to `pthread_getspecific'
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/2.7.2.3/libobjc.a(thr-posix.o): In function `objc_mu
tex_trylock':
thr-posix.o(.text+0x2b5): undefined reference to `pthread_mutex_trylock'
make[3]: *** [phaser_chess] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/lib/gnome-0.9/programs/phaser-chess'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/lib/gnome-0.9/programs'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/lib/gnome-0.9'
make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2

I'm wondering if this is because I'm running libc6 system.

Any enlightenment is appreciated,
       
        David


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .


Reply to: