[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Please recommend a quality 4GB hard drive



Simon Karpen <slk@acm.rpi.edu> writes:

> Which WD drives have you had good luck with?
> 
> I have yet to see a recent one last more than a year...

I have several (3) old Caviar drives.  One is a 170 meg and the other
two are 540 meg.  One is six years old; the other, probably about 5;
and the third is about the same.  All worked fine for at least the
first 4-5 years of their life even though they were powered up
24/7/365.  The 170 developed some bad sectors about 1/2 year ago; the
younger 540 meg had the same problem at about the same time.  The
5-year-old 540 meg is still going strong.

Considering that they were all cheap IDE drives, originally installed
in a poorly-ventilated case, it is not bad.

John

> 
> --Simon
> 
> On 10 Oct 1997, John Goerzen wrote:
> 
> > I've had nothing but good luck with Seagate and Western Digital.
> > Conner, I agree has horrible problems.
> > 
> > Simon Karpen <slk@acm.rpi.edu> writes:
> > 
> > > Right now, my personal system has a Micropolis Stinger (5400rpm 4.3GB,
> > > Ultra SCSI), and hasn't had any problems. The drive is a bit noisy, but
> > > seems to be very solid. I've never had any real problems with Quantum drives,
> > > but I can say to stay away from any form of Conner/Seagate/Western Digital
> > > drives. The failure rates are *horrible*. I've also heard many good things
> > > about the recent IBM drives.
> > > 
> > > Simon Karpen	
> > > karpes@rpi.edu	  slk@acm.rpi.edu
> > > "Fixing Unix is easier than living with NT."
> > > 		--Larry McVoy
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --
> > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
> > > debian-user-request@lists.debian.org . 
> > > Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
> > > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > John Goerzen          | Running Debian GNU/Linux (www.debian.org)
> > Custom Programming    | Debian GNU/Linux is a free replacement for
> > jgoerzen@complete.org | DOS/Windows -- check it out at www.debian.org.
> > ----------------------+----------------------------------------------
> > Notice: You may purchase the right to send me unsolicited commercial e-mail
> > ("spam") for the fee of $500 (USD) per message.  Billing can be either
> > pre-arranged or can occur automatically after the reception of a spam.
> > Failure to pay will be treated in accordance to US Code, title 47, sec. 227,
> > which allows unsolicited e-mail to be punishable by action to recover actual
> > monetary loss or $500, whichever is greater, per violation.  Sending spam
> > to me without payment constitutes unauthorized access to my mail daemon,
> > which is in violation of federal law.
> > 
> 
> Simon Karpen	
> karpes@rpi.edu	  slk@acm.rpi.edu
> "Those that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
> 		--Ben Franklin
> 
> 
> --
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
> debian-user-request@lists.debian.org . 
> Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
> 

-- 
John Goerzen          | Running Debian GNU/Linux (www.debian.org)
Custom Programming    | Debian GNU/Linux is a free replacement for
jgoerzen@complete.org | DOS/Windows -- check it out at www.debian.org.
----------------------+----------------------------------------------
Notice: You may purchase the right to send me unsolicited commercial e-mail
("spam") for the fee of $500 (USD) per message.  Billing can be either
pre-arranged or can occur automatically after the reception of a spam.
Failure to pay will be treated in accordance to US Code, title 47, sec. 227,
which allows unsolicited e-mail to be punishable by action to recover actual
monetary loss or $500, whichever is greater, per violation.  Sending spam
to me without payment constitutes unauthorized access to my mail daemon,
which is in violation of federal law.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .


Reply to: