On Thu, 2 Oct 1997, David Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Oct 1997, David Wright wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Oct 1997, David Stern wrote:
> > [..Deleted stuff for brevity..]
> > > Are you merely a stickler for detail, or does it concern you that
> > > devices exist which have little (if any) practical use and are
> > > potentially problematic?
> > Yes, I'm afraid I'm a stickler for detail. It looks like the (old, if
> > that's what you used; it's certainly what I used) installation disks are
> > broken if they have /dev/sda16 on them. If /you/ had created /device/, then
> > the problem might have only been present on your system. That's what I
> > understood Philippe to be implying with "BTW, you have created sda16
> > yourself didn't you :-)".
> So, I suppose that creating 16 scsi devices was merely an oversight, and
> likewise that creating 20 ide devices was roughly the same, thus devices
> 16-20 serve no practical purpose (unless obfuscation counts), correct?
You can have up to 64 partitions on a single IDE disk, or up to 16
partitions on a single SCSI disk, at least as far as Linux is
concerned; in practice you will rarely want so many.
Maybe that's why the debian maintainer created 16 scsi devices?
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .
- Re: mke2fs
- From: Remco Blaakmeer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Re: mke2fs
- From: David Stern <email@example.com>