Re: /etc/init.d structure [long rant]
>>"E.L. Meijer (Eric)" wrote:
>[ ... ]
>
...
>I always used to think it was me who didn't get it. I customized one
>runlevel to run without xdm. I used this runlevel to upgrade XFree86,
>so that if anything screwed up, I would not have xdm continously
>restarting a bogus X setup. This can be very annoying and very hard to
>escape, I know from experience. However, after the configuration
>script is done, it starts xdm as if no runlevels exist (I guess it only
>checks /etc/X11/config). I agree fully that a proper implementation of
>sysvr4 would be a Good Thing.
Ditto.
I always wandered why there are all those redundant links in rc?.d
dirs, and why I can't easily make a runlevel for xdm I used to have in
Slack.
--
Dimitri
emaziuk at curtin dot edu dot au, if you're replying to
------------------------------- a Usenet posting
Avoid reality at all costs.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: