firstname.lastname@example.org (Clint Adams) writes:
> You could conceivably just write a stripped-down IRC client that would use
> the standard IRC services. But from what I've heard about ICQ, everyone's
> given a unique identifier, while IRC has that nick problem.
user@host is usually reliably unique.
Actually, IRC uses this too if you look at the implemented
protocols (not the RFC-- it's too far out of date). nick!user@host is a
full user specifier guaranteed uniqe (ignoring spoofing for the moment)
used by the servers. It would make sense if IRC would simply drop the
unique nickname requirement; but alas, 'tis not to be.
That said, you still require a centralized registration point(s);
both ICQ and Powwow do this. Who's going to commit permanent resources?
BC AB 28 19 A6 A4 FF 5B CA 4D B4 03 3A A7 F4 5C
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .
- Re: ICQ
- From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Clint Adams)