Re: naming convention question
I wrote:
> "unreleased-1.3" and "unreleased-2.0" would be more useful and less
> confusing.
Rick Hawkins writes:
> but not nearly so cool :)
If you say so. I just find them obscure.
> besides, this way they stay buzz, bo, hamm, etc. after release, and the
> symlinks for stable & unstable are just changed.
What do the names have to do with that?
John Hasler
jghasler@win.bright.net (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: