Re: Security hole in Debian's /bin/false?

To: "Eloy A. Paris" <eparis@ven.ra.rockwell.com>
Cc: debian-user@lists.DEBIAN.ORG
Subject: Re: Security hole in Debian's /bin/false?
From: Jesse Goldman <jgoldman@hecate.fnal.gov>
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 1997 02:56:41 -0500 (CDT)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.SGI.3.96.970706025445.9336B-100000@hecate.fnal.gov>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 5pnhf4$2qs$1@zeus.ven.ra.rockwell.com>

Hi,

I don't know about other Unices but at least IRIX has it's /bin/true and
/bin/false set to shell scripts as well. It seems that Debian's no worse
off than SGIs and other Linux distributions at least.

J. Goldman


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Security hole in Debian's /bin/false?
  - From: Alexander Koch <efraim@argh.org>
- Re: Security hole in Debian's /bin/false?
  - From: Hamish Moffatt <moffatt@yallara.cs.rmit.edu.au>

References:
- Security hole in Debian's /bin/false?
  - From: eparis@ven.ra.rockwell.com (Eloy A. Paris)

Prev by Date: Re: First Mars Pictures
Next by Date: Re: IRQTune Problem
Previous by thread: Security hole in Debian's /bin/false?
Next by thread: Re: Security hole in Debian's /bin/false?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread