Links to package's bugs on the package web-page
Hi
It would be nice to see links to the Bug Tracking
System (BTS) from the web pages the individual
packages can be downloaded on www.debian.org.
Those interested in upgrading individual packages
would so be able to check the reported bugs before
starting the process which might break their working
systems.
By the way, I was just curious about the way NetBSD
implements their BTS (they use GNATS). For those
interested, have a look at
http://www.netbsd.org/Misc/send-pr.html.
and
http://www.netbsd.org/Misc/query-pr.html
for query about known bugs.
I think Debian would benefit from something like that
Thanks,
Lazaro
--
Lazaro D. Salem E-mail: salem@rf.no
RF-Rogaland Research Phone: +47 51 87 50 00
P.O.Box 2503, Ullandhaug Direct: +47 51 87 50 65
N-4004 Stavanger, NORWAY Fax: +47 51 87 52 00
> Two questions:
> 1. What's good about GNU libc?
> 2. Whose libc is libc5?
LIBC5 is GNU libc with substantial patches for Linux. LIBC6 is GNU libc with
the Linux support merged back in to the main source thread. GNU calls these
LIBC 1 and 2. We call it LIBC6 on Linux because our version numbers didn't
follow the GNU ones.
All Linux distributions will go to LIBC6. There are no hold-outs that I know
of.
Bruce
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 1997 17:01:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jean Pierre LeJacq <jplejacq@quoininc.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: xemacs and emacs
Message-ID: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.970407170024.939D-100000@weed.quoininc.com>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
I have both working fine on my system which is based on the
unstable branch. Didn't have to do anything special.
--
Jean Pierre
On Mon, 7 Apr 1997, Steve Hsieh wrote:
> Can someone explain why the xemacs and emacs packages can't coexist on the
> same Debian system? (What would it take to make them coexist?)
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: