Re: routing setup question
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 15-Apr-97 Benedikt Eric Heinen wrote:
>are arbritrary addresses for my own subnet. The 193.135.252.47 and
>193.135.252.179 were addresses assigned to me by my ISP. Both are routed
>from his machine, so if I try a traceroute from icemark to
>firefrancs new address without setting the host-route for .179 to my
>second machine first, the traceroute packets just 'run in circles' between
>icemark and lisa. Still, there's one host at thenet that still needs to be
>configured properly (traceroute from the outside currently stops before
>reaching lisa, but that will be fixed soon). The problem on my own system
>can't currently be solved by thenet, as their "linux guy" is on a
>holiday at the moment...
You have to assign *.179 to eth0 on icemark - *.47 to eth0 on firefrancs.
Assign ppp0 as default route on icemark and add *.179 to routing table so
*.179 isn't sent out ppp0. Anything not in the routing table is sent out via
the default route. Could explain the loop.
Assign eth0 as default route on firefrancs.
And until outside packets are routed properly you'll never know if it works.
A traceroute from lisa should show lisa -> icemark -> firefranc. From
icemark it should show icemark -> firefrancs. This is the only checking you
can do until the outside gateway is set up.
My next question would be are those IP's arbitrary at the lisa machine? Is
the lisa machine the server at your ISP? Strange that outside packets don't
even reach lisa is why I ask.
Have a good one.
- ----------------------------------
Rick Jones E-Mail: Rick <rickya@siservices.net>
Date: 15-Apr-97 Time: 16:10:29
- ----------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBM1PgtQi+Ph+i3TgpAQE3PwP+NDQQoWPq6EDM0w8V2B22pppQUWRHPK7Y
itq2YrjEBX/Kx198b5B9NGBUexCffDh7zXfaI8Ji7273txx7KU1qSA8uHGJ0B692
VHuFeCbFjL+2+bCB+N7uXDci7jBHi6G1mQd5XdFyKsYifgfjDqgXrwlAtsYIu6NO
h00+Tb2Sv28=
=ZE3L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: