Re: communicator
On Tue, 8 Apr 1997, m* wrote:
> quick one:
>
>
> is communicator a memory hog?
>
> my guess is yes.
>
> m*
>
> --
> "The Shining One"
> --
I just installed the beta3 on a 486-66mhz with 12mb. The only improvement
over beta2 that is obvious is stability. It takes a longgggggggggg time to
load. If it's not hogging memory, it's hogging something else (my patience
maybe). I haven't tried the page composer yet. beta2 was very explosive in
this area. All the previous versions have wanted to rewrite html for me in
annoying ways. I mean if I say ./foo or ../foo for a link in the dialog
box, that's what I want in the html.
BTW - It's also a piece of !@#%$% on the same box under win95.
Paul Wade - Greenbush Technologies Corporation
http://www.greenbush.com/cds.html
Linux CD's sent worldwide
Reply to: