Upgrading rex's libc, was Re: Bug in libc5.4.13

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Upgrading rex's libc, was Re: Bug in libc5.4.13
From: Adriano Nagelschmidt Rodrigues <anr@ime.usp.br>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 1997 11:19:43 -0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 19970120131944.11370.qmail@catatau.ime.usp.br>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 199701200041.LAA09415@atom.ansto.gov.au>
References: <[🔎] 199701200041.LAA09415@atom.ansto.gov.au>

Tadeusz Bak writes:

[SNIP]

 > The bug is fixed in libc5.4.17 (from "bo" directory). So I think that 
 > libc in "rex" should be upgraded.

Yes, why not upgrade rex's libc? Nothing would break, the packages are
ready... If we want rex to be stable, that would be part of the normal bug
fixing routine.

Regards,

--
Adriano

--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com

Reply to:

References:
- Bug in libc5.4.13
  - From: bak@atom.ansto.gov.au (Tadeusz Bak)

Prev by Date: Re: What's the ALT-F4 stuff?
Next by Date: Re: Free space on Linux Drive
Previous by thread: Bug in libc5.4.13
Next by thread: RE: Some thoughts for Debian
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread