Re: PPP problem w/ 1.1 install
- To: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@pilgrim.umass.edu>
- Cc: Debian Users mailing list <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: PPP problem w/ 1.1 install
- From: Amos Shapira <amos@dsi.co.il>
- Date: Sun, 02 Jun 1996 21:58:23 +0300
- Message-id: <[🔎] 31B1E44F.342D9AAB@dsi.co.il>
- References: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960529102423.10235B-100000@thym.remm.uqam.ca> <31AD0D9B.729CB970@verisim.com> <gvxk9xtdgop.fsf@diamond.pilgrim.umass.edu> <31AE1D35.4819F40B@verisim.com> <gvx4toxpi7n.fsf@diamond.pilgrim.umass.edu>
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> Hi,
> >>"Brian" == Brian C White <bcwhite@verisim.com> writes:
>
> >> >> There is indeed a Debian-ized version of the kernel. The package
> >> is >> called kernel-image.
I'm still looking for this kernel-image package. Can't find it in the ls-lR
files.
>
> >> You could also grab the raw source and use kernel-package package
> >> to generate your new image package. This is the recommended method
> >> for generating custom kernel images.
This sounds much more like it.
Now what about support for multiple kernels? Is it possible to have a
rule to install the new kernel *near* (instead of over) other kernels, or
even near other compiles of same kernel? You must know the urge to keep
at least one prooven kernel around in case the new one crashes.
As it is now, it looks like ytou have to manually shift /System.map and
/vmlinuz and add entries to lilo.conf, or am I missing something?
Cheers,
--
--Amos Shapira | "Of course Australia was marked for
| glory, for its people had been chosen
amos@dsi.co.il | by the finest judges in England."
| -- Anonymous
Reply to: