Re: /etc/rc.local not used?

To: miquels@cistron.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg)
Cc: submit-linux-debian-user@ratatosk.yggdrasil.com
Subject: Re: /etc/rc.local not used?
From: Carl V Streeter <streeter@cae.wisc.edu>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 00:15:08 -0600 (CST)
Message-id: <[🔎] 199603100615.AAA29806@hp-151.cae.wisc.edu>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 96030922430.130033@drinkel.ow.org> from "Miquel van Smoorenburg" at Mar 9, 96 01:00:33 pm

Miquel van Smoorenburg writes:
> 
> It's a left over from the old bsd-like boot procedure.
> Some people have asked me to re-instate it, but I'd
> like some input on when it should be executed. 

Given /etc/rc.boot do we *really* need it?

-- 
Carl Streeter                   |  "Etiquette-wise, there is no proper time 
streeter@cae.wisc.edu           |    to use the phrase 'It sucks.'" --Dogbert
Just another Perl hacker        |  "I'm a heartless bastard." --Linus Torvalds
Ask me about Debian/GNU Linux.  |    http://www.cae.wisc.edu/~streeter/

Reply to:

References:
- Re: /etc/rc.local not used?
  - From: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: /etc/rc.local not used?
Next by Date: Re: Australian Mirror
Previous by thread: Re: /etc/rc.local not used?
Next by thread: Re: /etc/rc.local not used?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread