Re: dpkg-1.4.0.1
On Wed, 25 Sep 1996, Alex Romosan wrote:
> i upgraded dpkg on one of the machines here to 1.4.0.1 and i've found
> that dpkg-name is gone. was it intentional, or did it accidentally get
> left out of the package?
>
I believe you will find it in dpkg-dev.
Luck,
Dwarf
------------ --------------
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: dwarf@polaris.net
------------ If you don't see what you want, just ask --------------
>From miss
Received: from mongo.pixar.com (138.72.50.60)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 26 Sep 1996 17:15:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 28091 invoked from smtpd); 26 Sep 1996 16:59:38 -0000
Received: from primer.i-connect.net (HELO primer) (bruce@206.139.73.13)
by mongo.pixar.com with SMTP; 26 Sep 1996 16:58:54 -0000
Message-Id: <m0v6JWd-000gFtC@morris.heel.fgg.eur.nl>
From: branderh@iaehv.nl (Erick Branderhorst)
Subject: Re: Will dpkg 1.4 work under buzz?
To: amos@dsi.co.il (Amos Shapira)
Date:Thu, 26 Sep 1996 17:42:59 +0100
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 199609261653.SAA00806@birnam.dsi.co.il> from "Amos Shapira" at Sep 26, 96 06:53:34 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25 PGP2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 445
Resent-Message-ID: <"cZ-om.0.A61.xWhIo"@primer>
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Resent-Reply-To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/96
X-Loop: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> I'm encountering some annoying (and apparently well-known) problems
> with dselect from dpkg 1.2.14elf (e.g. after a search the arrow keys
> loose their function).
>
> I wander if it is safe to install one of the 1.4 version of dpkg on
> my mostly buzz-fixed system.
I have the most recent dpkg on my system and it works fine. I think
that it is fairly save to install it on your mostly buzz-fixed system
as well. But be carefull.
Erick
Reply to: