program cc1 got fatal signal 6
I just recently installed Debian from the August 96 release of Infomagic's 6 cd
set. This is the best distribution, after trying the others on the cd set.
I have this one problem though, I can't compile a kernel. I have tried both 2.0.20 and 2.0.21.
Here is a paste of the exact place and errors:
make zlilo
...
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.0.20/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strength-reduce -pipe -m486 -malign-loops=2 -malign-jumps=2 -malign-functions=2 -DCPU=586 -c -o console.o console.c
cpp: output pipe has been closed
gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 6
make[3]: *** [console.o] Error 1
Here is /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
cpu : 586
model : Pentium 60/66
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
stepping : 5
fdiv_bug : yes
hlt_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid : yes
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr mce cx8
bogomips : 26.52
Here is the output of free
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 14624 9460 5164 6396 1504 4404
-/+ buffers: 3552 11072
Swap: 40788 2232 38556
The output of gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/2.7.2/specs
gcc version 2.7.2
Here is the output of ldconfig -v
ldconfig: version 1.7.14
/usr/local/lib:
/usr/lib:
libgpm.so.1 => libgpm.so.1.06
libproc.so.0.99 => libproc.so.0.99
libgdbm.so.1 => libgdbm.so.1.7.3
libdb.so.1 => libdb.so.1.85.2
libhistory.so.2.0 => libhistory.so.2.0
libpanel.so.3.0 => libpanel.so.3.0
libmenu.so.3.0 => libmenu.so.3.0
libform.so.3.0 => libform.so.3.0
libpthreads.so.1 => libpthreads.so.1.60.beta2
/lib:
libe2p.so.2 => libe2p.so.2.1
libext2fs.so.2 => libext2fs.so.2.0
libss.so.2 => libss.so.2.0
libcom_err.so.2 => libcom_err.so.2.0
libreadline.so.2.0 => libreadline.so.2.0
libncurses.so.3.0 => libncurses.so.3.0
libm.so.5 => libm.so.5.0.5
libc.so.5 => libc.so.5.2.18
libdl.so.1 => libdl.so.1.7.14
If there is any more info, please let me know. I am not sure that my mail is configured properly, so reply to walterp@rapidramp.com
Thanks In Advance,
Walter L. Preuninger II
Reply to: