[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: seeking WWW browser (smaller than Netscape)



If you want to view it that way, graphics were not html, they were a 
Mosiac'ism.

Shaya
--
Shaya Potter
spotter@itd.nrl.navy.mil


On Mon, 9 Sep 1996, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:

> On Sep 8,  9:27am, Bill Roman wrote:
> > Subject: seeking WWW browser (smaller than Netscape)
> :
> : I've tried Mosaic (2.7 beta), but it's rather dated (no frames, for
> : one thing).
> 
> Frames are *not* HTML.  They are a Netscape-ism.  For information on
> the current draft version of the HTML specification (HTML 3.2), check
> out
> 
>     http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/Wilbur/
> 
> I agree that Mosaic 2.7b5 is a bit of a problem.  The developers
> themselves call it "large and hacked".  They are working on version
> 2.8, which will be a major rewrite and will support the HTML 3.2 spec.
>  See the comments in the 2.7b5 release notes:
>  http://www.ncsa.uiuc.edu/SDG/Software/XMosaic/help-on-version-2.7b5.html#about
> 
> Hope that's of use...
> 
> Chris -)-----
> 
> -- 
> Christopher R. Hertel -)-----                   University of Minnesota
> crh@nts.umn.edu              Networking and Telecommunications Services
> 
> 



Reply to: