Re: slack2deb script and controversy
- To: "William S. Gribble" <grib@cs.utexas.edu>
- Cc: debian-user@Pixar.com
- Subject: Re: slack2deb script and controversy
- From: Alan Eugene Davis <adavis@kuentos.guam.net>
- Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 14:12:28 +1000 (GST)
- Message-id: <Pine.BSD/.3.91.960223134455.15043A-100000@saba.kuentos.guam.net>
- In-reply-to: <199602230253.UAA01017@cascade.cs.utexas.edu>
On Thu, 22 Feb 1996, William S. Gribble wrote:
> - exactly what software is lacking from Debian? I ask because I'd like
> to hear about interesting stuff that I don't know about, and maybe make
> debian packages.
A few right off, but there are surely lots more:
>From Sunsite:
uncompress (perhaps it is a non-free?)
zip/unzip
ls color
jed: an emacs clone, fast to boot, very close to emacs
sc is apparently unix standard, and is able to output LaTeX tables.
various graphics viewers
I've got emacs 19.30 from Slackware---it's significantly
changed; GNU/Linux should surely be up to date on this (it
was up on Sunsite in two days of its release.
Utilities and applications from Sunsite (as source)
Saw a filesystem to read/write dos compressed filesystem
Mac compression utilities I needed to solve a problem
Little stuff
raytracing
other graphics
I'd like to see a spectrum of graphics libraries available:
pnglib
libjpeg
?pbmlib
(and the facility available for conversion).
Alot of software is around the net all ready for linux.
I thought that having pointers would be useful, but need to have a way to
get them into debian. You will never be albe to cover everything,
Big packages I have running but which may be too big to package:
GRASS
Postgres95 compiled and is running
ADA (GNAT)
Other interesing software around:
xephem or
ephem (astronomical ephemeris: there were linux
binaries on the net)
another astronomical calendar or ephemeris program(s)
And still looking for more.
xtide
various x applications built without complaint
xantfarm
xdaliclock
xarclock
Like to see:
units (standard unix?)
xview X-window manager?
Imagemagick
netPBM
> - what documentation is missing from Debian that you miss from Slackware?
> I haven't used Slackware in about 2 years, so I don't know what the
> state of the art is in docs.
What I liked about the LDP was that one isn't assumed to be an idiot:
I like the uphill battle, I appreciated that the basic information was
there.
I'd like to see a treatment of the /etc/ directory and (of course) a
man page for dpkg. More nuts and bolts on how to get the system to
where one can do what he'd like with it.
> - what kind of ``tweaking'' do you want to do that debian doesn't allow?
> If there's some flexibility that's missing, it's important to know about
> it.
What I have had to do with Slackware would be, perhaps, to do a link
to a library that some package didn't see. Hopefully things would
eventually standardize. But imagine if I had set this up, then had a
package write over or delete the link.
It's not that debian doesn't allow it, but if debian's installation
scripts get too fancy, I won't have confidence that I will know what
they did...
Reply to: