Re: hata mesaji?
Merhaba,
Aslinda bu tur hatalarda, "cozum sudur" denebilecek bir yontem varmi
bilmiyorum. Bu gibi durumlarda, hatayi nasil ne sekilde aldiginizda onemli.
Yani bu hatadan once bir paketmi kurmayi denediniz, paketmi kaldirmayi
denediniz. Yada bir paketin konfigurasyonunu eksikmi birakdiniz. Bu hataya
neyin sebep oldugu, yada hangi paketin sebep oldugu onemlidir. Siz su
sekilde bir deneyin bence,
"dpkg --configure -a"
ile configure edilmemis paketler varsa configure edilir. Daha sonra tekrar
"apt-get -f install" komutunu deneyin. Sonuca ulasamazsaniz,
"apt-get install --reinstall libc6" ile deneyin.
Kurulumu duzgunce yaparsa, "apt-get -f install" ile bi kontrol edin
duzelmismi diye. Bundan da sonuc alamazsaniz,
"dpkg -i --force-overwrite
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.2.5-11.5_i386.deb"
ile uzerine kurmayi deneyerek deneyebilirsiniz.
Saygilar,
Serdar Aytekin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ayhan BARIS" <abaris@oyaktur.com.tr>
To: <debian-user-turkish@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 2:39 PM
Subject: hata mesaji?
Mesaj aşagida ne yapabilirim?
fatagnus:/home/ayhan# apt-get -f install
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
libc6
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libc6
0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
4 packages not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B/3383kB of archives. After unpacking 13.1MB will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] Y
(Reading database ... 111 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libc6 (from .../libc6_2.2.5-11.5_i386.deb) ...
dpkg not recorded as installed, cannot check for epoch support !
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.2.5-11.5_i386.deb
(--unpack):
subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.2.5-11.5_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Reply to: