Re: [OT] correo de lists.debian.org
El 31/05/14 02:20, Rolo Navarta escribió:
> Hola lista, alguien me podría explicar que es este correo?
>
> Gracias!
>
> ---------- Mensaje reenviado ----------
> De: "Debian Listmaster Team" <listmaster@lists.debian.org
> <mailto:listmaster@lists.debian.org>>
> Fecha: 30/05/2014 14:45
> Asunto: lists.debian.org <http://lists.debian.org> has received bounces
> from you
> Para: <listas.rolo@gmail.com <mailto:listas.rolo@gmail.com>>
>
> Dear subscriber,
>
> We've encountered some problems while sending listmail to your
> emailaddress listas.rolo@gmail.com <mailto:listas.rolo@gmail.com>.
>
> In the last seven days we've seen bounces for the following list:
> * debian-user-spanish
> 1 bounce out of 154 mails in 7 days (0%, kick-score is 80%)
> (http://lists.debian.org/bounces/MQ4XArND8SkWOk48f2LPqg)
>
> (The link above points to a copy of the latest bounce
> and will be valid for seven days.)
>
> If the bounce-rate passes the kick-score, our bounce-detection will forcibly
> remove your subscription.
>
> Bounces happen from time to time when spam slips through our filters but are
> rejected by your mail provider. If you are your own mail provider and use
> 'Before-Queue Content filtering', you should whitelist bendel.debian.org
> <http://bendel.debian.org> from
> Content filtering.
>
> However: You can safely ignore this message (and you will not be
> unsubscribed
> :-) ) if your kick-score remains low.
>
> For more information see http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ListMaster/FAQ
>
> You are welcome to contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> <mailto:listmaster@lists.debian.org> if you think this
> message was sent in error.
>
> Sincerely,
> The Listmaster Team
> --
> http://lists.debian.org
>
Pues significa lo que pone. Que te han mandado un mensaje y gmail lo ha
rebotado. Que si eso llega a unos niveles que se consideran inaceptables
te darán automáticamente de baja. Pero tranquilo, estás muy lejos de
llegar a esos niveles.
PS:Por favor, cuando escribas a la lista procura desactivar el html
Reply to: