RE: linux y cad
Me extraña esta son las cabeceras del correo dirigido a la lista por
jmelgarejo@mailtv.ole.com
más parece un pequeño lio del servidor de correo o el repartidor ( espero
:-))
Received: from murphy.debian.org (murphy.debian.org [65.125.64.134])
by leganes.uf-isf.es (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA24692
for <jfcarvajal@uf-isf.es>; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 01:41:14 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP
id CB2901FA30; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 18:54:54 -0500 (CDT)
Old-Return-Path: <jmelgarejo@mailtv.ole.com>
Received: from tics1.ole.com.pe (unknown [200.37.130.13])
by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1451FA27
for <debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org>; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 18:54:49 -0500
(CDT)
Received: (from nobody@localhost)
by tics1.ole.com.pe (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA26949;
Mon, 30 Sep 2002 18:54:44 -0500 (PET)
(envelope-from jmelgarejo@mailtv.ole.com)
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 18:54:44 -0500 (PET)
Message-Id: <200209302354.SAA26949@tics1.ole.com.pe>
Subject: linux y cad
To: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
From: " " <jmelgarejo@mailtv.ole.com>
Reply-To: " " <jmelgarejo@mailtv.ole.com>
Cc: j.melgarejo@terra.com.pe
Organization: WorldGate Communications
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.4 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME,NO_MX_FOR_FROM
version=2.20
X-Spam-Level: **
Resent-Message-ID: <wBouJ.A.ywD.OROm9@murphy>
Resent-From: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/50163
X-Loop: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
List-Post: <mailto:debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org>
List-Help:
<mailto:debian-user-spanish-request@lists.debian.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:
<mailto:debian-user-spanish-request@lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe:
<mailto:debian-user-spanish-request@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: debian-user-spanish-request@lists.debian.org
Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 18:54:54 -0500 (CDT)
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 235
Status:
Reply to: