Re: erro ao compilar o kernel 2.6.8
On 05-07-2006 21:54, rsaad@gelre.com.br wrote:
Ao tentar compilar o kernel 2.6.8 na execução do comando #make bzImage,
deu o seguinte erro:
In file included from net/core/sock.c:121:
include/net/xfrm.h:17:25: include/net/ip6_fib.h: Erro de entrada/saída
In file included from net/core/sock.c:121:
include/net/xfrm.h:517: error: field `rt6' has incomplete type
make[2]: ** [net/core/sock.o] Erro 1
make[1]: ** [net/core] Erro 2
make: ** [net] Erro 2
Tentei dar o comando #make modules, ai veio o seguinte erro:
fs/ufs/dir.c: In function `ufs_check_dir_entry':
fs/ufs/dir.c:300: internal compiler error: Erro no barramento
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions, see
<URL:file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-3.3/README.Bugs>.
make[2]: ** [fs/ufs/dir.o] Erro 1
make[1]: ** [fs/ufs] Erro 2
make: ** [fs] Erro 2
Atualmente estou usando: Linux debian 2.4.27-2-k7 #1 Mon May 16 17:18:17
JST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux
Alguem pode me ajudar
Tá faltando alguma biblioteca p/ seu sistema conseguir compilar as
coisas. Tirado do /usr/share/doc/kernel-package/README.gz
--------------
Firstly, you will need gcc, the libc development package (libc5-dev or
libc6-dev at the time of writing), and, on Intel platforms, bin86. [If
you use the menuconfig target of make, you will need ncursesX.X-dev,
and make xconfig also requires either tkX.X-dev for 2.4.X kernels, or
libqt3-mt-dev and g++ >= 3.0 for the new 2.6 kernel versions, and 2.6.X
kernels also have an additional option, make gconfig, which requires
libglade2-dev, and other packages these depend on]
The packages suggested are:
devel: gcc, libc5-dev/libc6-dev, binutils, make, and, for intel
x86 platforms, bin86 (non-Intel platforms don't need
this), modutils (or module-init-tools for 2.5.x+ kernels).
interpreters: awk, which is contained in either the mawk or gawk packages
base: gzip, shellutils, and grep.
---------------
--
Marcos
Reply to: