Re: jdk 1.3 ou higher
fred,
voce pode instalar na mao ou instalar o pacote.
apenas certifique-se de configurar o PATH adequadamente.
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 16:11:49 -0300
<fredm@chesf.gov.br> wrote:
> Gente,
>
> Dá uma olhada:
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------------- rec2:/etc/tomcat4#
> dpkg-reconfigure tomcat4 Could not start Tomcat 4.0 servlet engine because
> no Java Development Kit(JDK) was found. Please download and install JDK
> 1.3 or higher and set JAVA_HOME in /etc/default/tomcat4 to the JDK's
> installation
> directory.---------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Eu tenho que baixar o jdk1.3 e instalar na mão ou posso dar um apt-get
> install?
>
> olha o que eu achei:
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------------- rec2:/etc/tomcat4# apt-cache
> search jdk ibm-jdk1.1-installer - Installer for IBM Developer Kit for
> Linux, Java(TM) Technology Edition
> jde - Java Development Environment for Emacs or XEmacs.
> lib-rxtx-java - Full Java CommAPI implementation
> libnbio-java - NBIO: Nonblocking I/O for Java
> tya - JIT-compiler for Java.
> mmake - Makefile generator for Java programs
> vide - IDE for C++ and Java based on the V GUI
> jdk1.1 - JDK 1.1.x (Java Development Kit) - Runtime only
> jdk1.1-dev - JDK 1.1.x (Java Development Kit)
> jdk1.1-native - JDK 1.1.x Runtime - native threads extensions
> jdk1.1-native-dev - JDK 1.1.x - native threads extensions
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------------------------------
>
> jdk 1.1 tá baixo demais...
> Vou ter que pegar na página da sun?
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-portuguese-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
--
-------------------------------
Agney Lopes Roth Ferraz
agney@users.sourceforge.net
Reply to: