[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Problemas com modem pci apos atualizacao



Ola lista,
Intalei o kernel 2.4 por aqui, o anterior e o 2.2-idepci, e tenho um modem usr pci, no antigo kernel ele funcionava em ttyS5, precisei ajustar uns parametros e tal com setserial (io 0xdfa0, irq 9). Apos instalar o kernel 2.4.18-686 pre compilado (tenho um pentium III), o modem deixou de funcionar o plog diz que foi problema de input e olhando as mensagens de inicializacao deduzo que o problema e com configuracoes de io e tal, pois quando uso o setserial novamento me diz que o endereco ja esta sendo usado. Abaixo segue o trecho referente das mensagens de inicializacao do kernel e o retorno do comando lspci.

obrigado e abracos

juliano

#dmesg
Linux version 2.4.18-686 (herbert@gondolin) (gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease)) #1 Sun Apr 14 11:32:47 EST 2002
...
Serial driver version 5.05c (2001-07-08) with HUB-6 MANY_PORTS MULTIPORT SHARE_IRQ SERIAL_PCI enabled
ttyS00 at 0x03f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A
ttyS01 at 0x02f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A
PCI: Found IRQ 9 for device 00:12.0
Redundant entry in serial pci_table.  Please send the output of
lspci -vv, this message (12b9,1008,12b9,00aa)
and the manufacturer and name of serial board or modem board
to serial-pci-info@lists.sourceforge.net.
ttyS04 at port 0xdfa0 (irq = 9) is a 16550A
block: 128 slots per queue, batch=32
...

#lspci -vv
...
00:12.0 Serial controller: US Robotics/3Com 56K FaxModem Model 5610 (rev 01) (prog-if 02 [16550])
   Subsystem: US Robotics/3Com USR 56k Internal Voice Modem (Model 2976)
Control: I/O+ Mem- BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- Status: Cap+ 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
   Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 9
   Region 0: I/O ports at dfa0 [size=8]
   Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 2
Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold-)
       Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=2 PME-
...






Reply to: