Quoting Michelle Konzack (linux4michelle@tamay-dogan.net): > > > > de-latin1-nodeadkeys.kmap: > > > > keycode 13 = apostrophe grave > > > ^^^^^^^^^^ > > > Why not acute here? After all the apostrophe has its own key: > > > > > > keycode 43 = numbersign apostrophe > > > > Seems OK to me, yes. Objections? > > Ehm, what do you mean? > > keycode 13 = acute grave > > Yes this would be OK. Actually, I *do* remember why I initially proposed that de-latin1-nodeadkeys has: keycode 13 = apostrophe grave And not: keycode 13 = acute grave ....this is because the X keymap "de" with "nodeadkeys" as variant actually outputs an apostrophe *and not an acute*. The "de" keymap in its "basic" variant *does* output an acute, on the other hand. That sounds fairly illogical to me...but this is indeed how it is. So, if I take the stance of keeping consistency between X keymaps and console-data keymaps, I should keep "apostrophe" for the nondeadkeys variant....even if this is weird. So, after thinking, my easoning is that if the nodeadkeys variant should output an acute and not an apostrophe....then X keymaps should first be changed.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature