[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

BIND 9, ISC DHCPD und DNS Dynamic Update



Hallo Liste!

Ich habe mich heute mit der Frage DHCP und DNS Dynamic Update auseinander 
gesetzt.

Folgende Ausgangslage:

Ein Server mit Debian testing. Hier läuft BIND 9 und ISC DHCPD 
(isc-dhcpd-V3.1.0).

In Bind habe ich folgende Einstellungen:

root@marche:~# cat /etc/bind/named.conf
// This is the primary configuration file for the BIND DNS server named.
//
// Please read /usr/share/doc/bind9/README.Debian.gz for information on the
// structure of BIND configuration files in Debian, *BEFORE* you customize
// this configuration file.
//
// If you are just adding zones, please do that in /etc/bind/named.conf.local

include "/etc/bind/named.conf.options";

// prime the server with knowledge of the root servers
zone "." {
        type hint;
        file "/etc/bind/db.root";
};

// be authoritative for the localhost forward and reverse zones, and for
// broadcast zones as per RFC 1912

zone "localhost" {
        type master;
        file "/etc/bind/db.local";
};

zone "127.in-addr.arpa" {
        type master;
        file "/etc/bind/db.127";
};

zone "0.in-addr.arpa" {
        type master;
        file "/etc/bind/db.0";
};

zone "255.in-addr.arpa" {
        type master;
        file "/etc/bind/db.255";
};

// zone "com" { type delegation-only; };
// zone "net" { type delegation-only; };

// From the release notes:
//  Because many of our users are uncomfortable receiving undelegated answers
//  from root or top level domains, other than a few for whom that behaviour
//  has been trusted and expected for quite some length of time, we have now
//  introduced the "root-delegations-only" feature which applies 
delegation-only
//  logic to all top level domains, and to the root domain.  An exception list
//  should be specified, including "MUSEUM" and "DE", and any other top level
//  domains from whom undelegated responses are expected and trusted.
// root-delegation-only exclude { "DE"; "MUSEUM"; };

include "/etc/bind/named.conf.local";



root@marche:~# cat /etc/bind/named.conf.local
//
// Do any local configuration here
//

// Consider adding the 1918 zones here, if they are not used in your
// organization
//include "/etc/bind/zones.rfc1918";

zone "dlstest" IN {
    type master;
    file "/var/lib/bind/master/dlstest.zone";
    allow-update {
        127.0.0.1;
        192.168.1.0/24;
    };
};
zone "1.168.192.in-addr.arpa" IN {
    type master;
    file "/var/lib/bind/master/192.168.1.zone";
    allow-update {
        127.0.0.1;
        192.168.1.0/24;
    };
};



root@marche:~# cat /etc/bind/named.conf.options
options {
        directory "/var/cache/bind";

        // If there is a firewall between you and nameservers you want
        // to talk to, you might need to uncomment the query-source
        // directive below.  Previous versions of BIND always asked
        // questions using port 53, but BIND 8.1 and later use an unprivileged
        // port by default.

        // query-source address * port 53;

        // If your ISP provided one or more IP addresses for stable
        // nameservers, you probably want to use them as forwarders.
        // Uncomment the following block, and insert the addresses replacing
        // the all-0's placeholder.

        forwarders {
                195.3.96.67;
                195.3.96.68;
        };

        auth-nxdomain no;    # conform to RFC1035
        listen-on-v6 { any; };
};



DHCP habe ich wie folgt eingstellt:

root@marche:~# cat /etc/dhcp3/dhcpd.conf
#
# Sample configuration file for ISC dhcpd for Debian
#
# $Id: dhcpd.conf,v 1.1.1.1 2002/05/21 00:07:44 peloy Exp $
#

# The ddns-updates-style parameter controls whether or not the server will
# attempt to do a DNS update when a lease is confirmed. We default to the
# behavior of the version 2 packages ('none', since DHCP v2 didn't
# have support for DDNS.)
#
# The style parameter must be one of ad-hoc, interim or none. The
# ddns-update-style statement is only meaningful in the outer scope - it
# is evaluated once after reading the dhcpd.conf file, rather than each
# time a client is assigned an IP address, so there is no way to use
# different DNS update styles for different clients.
ddns-update-style interim;

# option definitions common to all supported networks...
option domain-name "dlstest";
option domain-name-servers ns1.dlstest, ns2.dlstest, ns3.dlstest;

default-lease-time 600;
min-lease-time 60;
max-lease-time 14400;

# Update DNS server zones
zone dlstest. {
    primary 127.0.0.1;
}
zone 1.168.192.in-addr.arpa. {
    primary 127.0.0.1;
}


# If this DHCP server is the official DHCP server for the local
# network, the authoritative directive should be uncommented.
authoritative;

# Use this to send dhcp log messages to a different log file (you also
# have to hack syslog.conf to complete the redirection).
log-facility local7;

# No service will be given on this subnet, but declaring it helps the
# DHCP server to understand the network topology.
subnet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
  range 192.168.1.50 192.168.1.100;
  default-lease-time 1800;
  allow booting;
  allow bootp;
  option routers router1.dlstest;
}

group {
  next-server marche.dlstest;
  filename "/pxelinux.0";

#  host client-001.install.dlstest {
#    hardware ethernet 00:0c:29:86:1a:fc;
#    fixed-address client-001.install.dlstest;
#  }

#  host client-002.install.dlstest {
#    hardware ethernet 00:0c:29:bc:58:de;
#    fixed-address client-002.install.dlstest;
#  }

#  host client-003.install.dlstest {
#    hardware ethernet 00:04:75:80:73:71;
#    fixed-address client-003.install.dlstest;
#  }
}


Beim einem kurzen Test erhalte ich folgendes Ergebnis:

root@marche:~# nsupdate
> update add basilicata.dlstest. 300 A 192.168.1.50
> send
update failed: SERVFAIL
> quit


Weiß jemand wo der Fehler vermutlich liegt oder zumindest wo er liegen könnte?

LG,
Leonhard

PS: Habe jetzt noch ein letztes mal Google angeworfen (mit "update failed: 
SERVFAIL") und bin auf diesen Thread gestoßen: 
https://internal.lboro.ac.uk/mail/public/lulu/2006-03/msg00011.html

Ich kann mir gut vorstellen, dass es auch hier ein Berechtigungsproblem gibt. 
Schließlich muss BIND sein Journal schreiben.

Frage: Weiß jemand, wo BIND sein Journal (für DDNS) hinschreiben will?


Reply to: