Re: The following packages have been kept back:

[Christian Knoke <chrisk@cknoke.de>]

On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 09:28:52PM +0200, Bjoern Schmidt wrote:
> Christian Knoke schrieb:
> >libxft-dev libxft2
> >  libxrender-dev libxrender1 php4-imap quanta render-dev timidity
> >timidity-el uw-imapd
> >  x-window-system x-window-system-core xbase-clients xine-ui xlibmesa3 
> >  xlibs
> >xlibs-dev
> >  xterm
> >0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 30 not upgraded.
> >
> >Was bedeutet dies? Ist ein --ignore-hold sinnvoll?
> 
> Sinnvoll ist ein 'apt-get dist-upgrade' und ein 'man apt-get' um zu
> erfahren warum das sinnvoll ist.

Hab Dank. Da wird einiges installiert. Nun bekomme ich:

karl:~# apt-get check
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
You might want to run 
pt-get -f install' to correct these.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  libxft-dev: Depends: libxft2 (= 2.1.2-5) but 2.1.2-6 is installed
E: Unmet dependencies. Try using -f.

Das ist mir nun etwas unklar, soll ich das Installieren einer älteren
Version forcieren?

Ich probiere:

karl:~# apt-get -f install libxft-dev
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages will be upgraded:
  libxft-dev
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 21 not upgraded.
83 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B/60.2kB of archives.
After unpacking 4096B disk space will be freed.

was mich nun vollends beunruhigt, "21 not upgraded"?

Gruß
Christian

-- 
Christian Knoke            * * *            http://cknoke.de
* * * * * * * * *  Ceterum censeo Microsoft esse dividendum.