vncserver liefert nur grauen Hintergrund
Hallo,
wenn ich mich auf meinen VNC-server verbinde, sehe ich
nur einen grauen Hintergrund und einen (bewegbaren) X-Zeiger.
ich starte den vncserver mit:
vncserver -geometry 1100x800 -depth 24
In meiner .vnc/xstartup steht
icewm
mein .vnc/<rechnername>:1.log steht:
05/12/02 11:27:54 Xvnc version 3.3.3r2+tight1.2.2
05/12/02 11:27:54 Copyright (C) AT&T Laboratories Cambridge.
05/12/02 11:27:54 All Rights Reserved.
05/12/02 11:27:54 See http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc for information on
VNC
05/12/02 11:27:54 Xvnc version 3.3.3r2+tight1.2.2
05/12/02 11:27:54 Copyright (C) AT&T Laboratories Cambridge.
05/12/02 11:27:54 All Rights Reserved.
05/12/02 11:27:54 See http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc for information on
VNC
05/12/02 11:27:54 Desktop name 'X' (si16406:1)
05/12/02 11:27:54 Protocol version supported 3.3
05/12/02 11:27:54 Listening for VNC connections on TCP port 5901
05/12/02 11:28:08 Got connection from client 10.2.226.110
05/12/02 11:28:08 Protocol version 3.5
05/12/02 11:28:08 Ignoring minor version mismatch
05/12/02 11:28:10 Pixel format for client 10.2.226.110:
05/12/02 11:28:10 32 bpp, depth 24, little endian
05/12/02 11:28:10 true colour: max r 255 g 255 b 255, shift r 16 g 8 b 0
05/12/02 11:28:10 no translation needed
05/12/02 11:28:10 Using tight encoding for client 10.2.226.110
05/12/02 11:28:10 rfbProcessClientNormalMessage: ignoring unknown encoding 8
05/12/02 11:28:10 Enabling X-style cursor updates for client 10.2.226.110
05/12/02 11:28:10 Enabling LastRect protocol extension for client
10.2.226.110
05/12/02 11:28:15 Client 10.2.226.110 gone
05/12/02 11:28:15 Statistics:
05/12/02 11:28:15 key events received 1, pointer events 45
05/12/02 11:28:15 framebuffer updates 1, rectangles 16, bytes 1310
Wenn ich X per startx oder per xdm starte startet der icewm.
Es handelt sich um woody und hat schon mal funktioniert.
Und ich weiß natürlich nicht mehr, was ich seither alles
verändert hab.
Hat irgendjemand eine Idee?
Im Voraus vielen Dank
Matthias Maisenbacher
Reply to: