[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [HS] Compiler firefox 3.5 RC2 sur Lenny AMD64



> Bonjour,

Salut,
 
> J'essaye de compiler firefox sur Lenny AMD64, mais j'ai le message suivant 
> quand je lance le script ./configure :
> 
> checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
> checking for gtk+-2.0 >= 2.10.0 gtk+-unix-print-2.0 glib-2.0 gobject-2.0 
> gdk-x11-2.0... Package gtk+-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path. 
> Perhaps you should add the directory containing `gtk+-2.0.pc' to the 
> PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'gtk+-2.0' found Package 
> gtk+-unix-print-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you 
> should add the directory containing `gtk+-unix-print-2.0.pc' to the 
> PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'gtk+-unix-print-2.0' found 
> Package glib-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you 
> should add the directory containing `glib-2.0.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH 
> environment variable No package 'glib-2.0' found Package gobject-2.0 was not 
> found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory 
> containing `gobject-2.0.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No 
> package 'gobject-2.0' found Package gdk-x11-2.0 was not found in the 
> pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing 
> `gdk-x11-2.0.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No 
> package 'gdk-x11-2.0' found
> configure: error: Library requirements (gtk+-2.0 >= 2.10.0 gtk+-unix-print-2.0 
> glib-2.0 gobject-2.0 gdk-x11-2.0) not met; consider adjusting the 
> PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your libraries are in a nonstandard 
> prefix so pkg-config can find them.
> 
> On dirait que pkg-config ne trouve des librairie (qui sont pour tant bien 
> installées). Quelqu'un peut il me dire comment régler ce problème?

Il manque probablement des paquets *-dev, genre libgtk2.0-dev. Les
installer et y aller petit à petit jusqu'à la disparition de ces
messages.

> Merci.

Pas de quoi,
Steve


Reply to: