[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Postfix et envoi de mails



Mouais, je suis sceptique, je demande à voir les journaux du serveur
Postfix pour être sûr que le client est bien différent de 127.0.0.0/8.

Alors voilà ce que j'ai dans mail.log :

Sep 23 20:11:34 kimsufi postfix/smtpd[8547]: connect from mir31-2-82-227-181-153.fbx.proxad.net[82.227.181.153] Sep 23 20:11:35 kimsufi postgrey[3670]: delayed 25100 seconds: client=mir31-2-82-227-181-153.fbx.proxad.net, from=sylar@sylar.org, to=sylar@sylar.org Sep 23 20:11:35 kimsufi postfix/smtpd[8547]: 12AE1268F9: client=mir31-2-82-227-181-153.fbx.proxad.net[82.227.181.153] Sep 23 20:11:35 kimsufi postfix/cleanup[10447]: 12AE1268F9: message-id=<46F6AD20.2070709@sylar.org> Sep 23 20:11:35 kimsufi postfix/qmgr[27015]: 12AE1268F9: from=<sylar@sylar.org>, size=639, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Sep 23 20:11:35 kimsufi spamd[15282]: spamd: connection from localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1] at port 3758
Sep 23 20:11:35 kimsufi spamd[15282]: spamd: setuid to sylar succeeded
Sep 23 20:11:35 kimsufi spamd[15282]: spamd: processing message <46F6AD20.2070709@sylar.org> for sylar:1000 Sep 23 20:11:35 kimsufi postfix/smtpd[8547]: disconnect from mir31-2-82-227-181-153.fbx.proxad.net[82.227.181.153] Sep 23 20:11:35 kimsufi spamd[15282]: spamd: clean message (0.0/5.0) for sylar:1000 in 0.6 seconds, 764 bytes. Sep 23 20:11:35 kimsufi spamd[15282]: spamd: result: . 0 - scantime=0.6,size=764,user=sylar,uid=1000,required_score=5.0,rhost=localhost.localdomain,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=3758,mid=<46F6AD20.2070709@sylar.org>,autolearn=ham
Sep 23 20:11:35 kimsufi spamd[26474]: prefork: child states: II
Sep 23 20:11:35 kimsufi postfix/local[10448]: 12AE1268F9: to=<sylar@sylar.org>, relay=local, delay=1, delays=0.28/0.01/0/0.73, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered to command: procmail -a "$EXTENSION")
Sep 23 20:11:35 kimsufi postfix/qmgr[27015]: 12AE1268F9: removed

Un tunnel, non ? C'est courant avec les machines qu'on gère à
distance.

C'est à dire ? J'avoue que ne comprends tjs pas ...

--
Sylvain



Reply to: