[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [infos] probléme serveurs debian...



Le Fri, 21 Nov 2003 16:08:13 +0100, patrice écrivait :
>http://linuxfr.org/2003/11/21/14650.html
>
>In particular the following machines have been affected:
> . klecker (security, non-us, web search, www-master)
>
alors ça explique ça :
Err http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Packages
  Could not connect to security.debian.org:80 (194.109.137.218). - connect (111 Connection refused)

Mon update me donne un certain nombre de paquets à mettre à jour :
12 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0  not upgraded.
Inst bsdutils (1:2.11n-7 Debian:3.0r2/stable)
Conf bsdutils (1:2.11n-7 Debian:3.0r2/stable)
Inst debianutils (1.16.2woody1 Debian:3.0r2/stable)
Conf debianutils (1.16.2woody1 Debian:3.0r2/stable)
Inst mount (2.11n-7 Debian:3.0r2/stable)
Conf mount (2.11n-7 Debian:3.0r2/stable)
Inst util-linux (2.11n-7 Debian:3.0r2/stable)
Conf util-linux (2.11n-7 Debian:3.0r2/stable)
Inst console-data (1999.08.29-24.2 Debian:3.0r2/stable)
Inst nano (1.0.6-3 Debian:3.0r2/stable)
Inst procps (1:2.0.7-8.woody1 Debian:3.0r2/stable)
Inst zlib1g (1:1.1.4-1.0woody0 Debian:3.0r2/stable)
Inst gnupg (1.0.6-4 Debian:3.0r2/stable)
Inst procmail (3.22-5 Debian:3.0r2/stable)
Inst util-linux-locales (2.11n-7 Debian:3.0r2/stable)
Inst xfonts-intl-european (1.2.1-0.woody.1 Debian:3.0r2/stable)
Conf console-data (1999.08.29-24.2 Debian:3.0r2/stable)
Conf nano (1.0.6-3 Debian:3.0r2/stable)
Conf procps (1:2.0.7-8.woody1 Debian:3.0r2/stable)
Conf zlib1g (1:1.1.4-1.0woody0 Debian:3.0r2/stable)
Conf gnupg (1.0.6-4 Debian:3.0r2/stable)
Conf procmail (3.22-5 Debian:3.0r2/stable)
Conf util-linux-locales (2.11n-7 Debian:3.0r2/stable)
Conf xfonts-intl-european (1.2.1-0.woody.1 Debian:3.0r2/stable)

L'annonce dit qu'un certain nombre de paquets pour
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 (woody), release 3.0r2 sont déjà sur des mirroirs,
ce qui voudrait dire que ce sont probablement des paquets corrects,mais
dans le doute, mieux vaut probablement attendre.

Merci pour l'info.
--
PII233




Reply to: