Re: StarOffice 5 and Potato - OK but not printing :-(
Well, I can't get it to print either. I get the following messages:
sh: /usr/local/glibc20/libdl.so.2: no version information available
(required by sh)
sh: /usr/local/glibc20/libdl.so.2: no version information available
(required by sh)
sh: /usr/local/glibc20/libc.so.6: no version information available (required
by sh)
sh: /usr/local/glibc20/libc.so.6: no version information available (required
by sh)
sh: /usr/local/glibc20/libc.so.6: no version information available (required
by /lib/libreadline.so.2)
sh: /usr/local/glibc20/libc.so.6: no version information available (required
by /lib/libreadline.so.2)
sh: /usr/local/glibc20/libc.so.6: no version information available (required
by /lib/libncurses.so.4)
sh: /usr/local/glibc20/libc.so.6: no version information available (required
by /lib/libncurses.so.4)
sh: error in loading shared libraries: /usr/local/glibc20/libc.so.6:
undefined symbol: _dl_global_scope_end
I looked in the various libraries in:
/usr/local/glibc20 and /usr/local/opt/Office50/lib
and found some hard-coded path to libraries in /lib while we would like
staroffice to use those in /usr/local/glibc20/. I tried to to patch (using
the same sed trick) some but did not found the one with the problem.
I am not much concerned about printing, so I am not looking any further,
hopefully, this path may lead to the solution.
Best regards,
Bernard
On Mon, Apr 26, 1999 at 01:53 -0500, Ryan Losh wrote:
> >
> > [Lengthy instructions for "tricking Star Office 5.0[1] into executing on a
> > glibc2.1 system deleted]
> >
>
> I'd like to know if *ANYONE* out there has gotten Star Office 5 to *PRINT*
> on a potato system running glibc2.1??? If so, would you please post your
> "recipe" to this list. **EXECUTING** Star Office is of little value to
> (most) people, if you CANNOT PRINT FROM IT!!
>
> Ryan
> rklosh@networksplus.net
>
Reply to: