Re: What are the Bogomips for a P166?
On Fri, 23 Apr 1999 shaleh@clifford.livenet.net wrote:
> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 12:14:46 -0400 (EDT)
> From: shaleh@clifford.livenet.net
> To: Pedro Guerreiro <pguerreiro@BIGFOOT.COM>
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: What are the Bogomips for a P166?
> Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 16:08:14 +0000
> Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
>
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > I'm having a problem with a machine in the lab. It's a Pentium 166 with 32Mb,
> > but the reported Bogomips are just 66.??. Somehow, this doesn't look to normal
> > to me, since my Pentium 225 MMX is giving 447.?? Bogomips.
> >
>
> My p75 here at work is 23 bogo mips. So a 150 would be around 50 - 60.
>
> > One other thing is that since I've upgraded to Slink on that machine, X became
> > unusable, since each time it needs to redisplay some part (or all) of the
> > screen, I can actually see it redraw _each_ line, taking about 1 minute to
> > redisplay the screen.
> >
>
from Bogomips mini-HOWTO:
As a very approximate guide, the BogoMips can be calculated by:
System BogoMips Comparison
Intel 8088 clock * (0.004 plusminus 0.001) 0.02
Intel/AMD 386SX clock * (0.14 plusminus 0.01) 0.8
Intel/AMD 386DX clock * (0.18 plusminus 0.01) 1(definition)
Motorola 68030 clock * (0.25 plusminus 0.005) 1.4
Cyrix/IBM 486 clock * (0.34 plusminus 0.065) 1.8
Intel Pentium clock * (0.40 plusminus 0.035) 2.2
Intel 486/AMD 5x86 clock * (0.50 plusminus 0.01) 2.8
Mips R4000/R4400 clock * (0.50 plusminus 0.015) 2.3
Nexgen Nx586 clock * (0.75 plusminus 0.010) 4.2
PowerPC 601 clock * (0.84 plusminus 0.015) 4.7
Alpha (all CPUs) clock * (0.99 plusminus 0.005) 5.5
Intel Pentium Pro clock * (0.99 plusminus 0.005) 5.5
Cyrix 5x86/6x86 clock * (1.00 plusminus 0.005) 5.6
Intel Pentium II clock * (1.00) 5.6
Mips R4600 clock * (1.00) 5.6
Alpha 21264 clock * (1.99) 11.1
AMD K5/K6 clock * (2.00 plusminus 0.010) 11.1
Pentium MMX clock * (2.00) 11.1
Motorola 68060 clock * (2.01) 11.2
66 for p166 and 447 for p225mmx seems to be fine
OK
Reply to: