Re: Very slow 3d games
Btw,i am also dual booting the same machine with
windows xp home ed. In xp,im have half life CS,
Warcraft 3, red alert installed . Theyre doing ok with
the same specs AFAICS.
RALPH BACOLOD
--- rafiks_rb@yahoo.com <rafiks_rb@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I understand that d savage chip is not really what u
> call a high end chip suited for gaming. But i once
> installed tuxracer in a pentium 1 win98 with far
more
> minimal specs. How come the game was far more
playable
> there?
> --- christian.schoenebeck@epost.de
> <christian.schoenebeck@epost.de> wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Apr 2003 01:52:46 -0700 (PDT)
> > ralph bacolod <rafiks_rb@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Gud day! I just installed woody in a celeron 1.7
> with
> > > 128mb sdram,20 gig ide hd . My mobo has an
onboard
> > > savage4 chip w/ 32 mb shared. .X didnt work
right
> away
> > > so i got a savage driver from d net to get it
> working.
> > > . I got X n0w but when i try to play games like
> > > tuxracer,armagetr0n and billard-gl,the graphics
is
> so
> > > slow. . As if the game is in slow motion. How do
i
> fix
> > > this? What could be the problem? I tried
googling
> but
> > > i couldnt find any answer.
> >
> > Don't expect too much from a savage chip with
shared
> memory. It's
> > inteded for use with standard apps like office
> suites, etc., not for
> > playing. So, what I'm trying to say is that you
> won't get it much faster
> > AFAIK with that hardware.
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
> debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
> http://search.yahoo.com
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
http://search.yahoo.com
Reply to: