[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Re: Apt should be called "inapt" (rhymes with "inept")
To
: Joe Emenaker <
joe@emenaker.com
>
Cc
: Jason Gunthorpe <
jgg@ualberta.ca
>, "Debian Users' Assistance Forum" <
debian-user@lists.debian.org
>
Subject
: Re: Apt should be called "inapt" (rhymes with "inept")
From
: Brent Buchholz <
ihatemilk@ihatemilk.org
>
Date
: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 19:17:41 -0500
Message-id
: <
20001017191741.A26784@ihatemilk.org
>
In-reply-to
: <008e01c03898$3c60dfa0$805b4181@damien>; from joe@emenaker.com on Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 05:13:21PM -0700
References
: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1001017171347.1525F-100000@wakko> <008e01c03898$3c60dfa0$805b4181@damien>
Just out of curiosity; what did you install that conflicted with netbase and friends? Brent
Reply to:
debian-user@lists.debian.org
Brent Buchholz (on-list)
Brent Buchholz (off-list)
Follow-Ups
:
Re: Apt should be called "inapt" (rhymes with "inept")
From:
"Joe Emenaker" <joe@emenaker.com>
References
:
Re: Apt should be called "inapt" (rhymes with "inept")
From:
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ualberta.ca>
Re: Apt should be called "inapt" (rhymes with "inept")
From:
"Joe Emenaker" <joe@emenaker.com>
Prev by Date:
Re: Apt should be called "inapt" (rhymes with "inept")
Next by Date:
Re: Apt should be called "inapt" (rhymes with "inept")
Previous by thread:
Re: Apt should be called "inapt" (rhymes with "inept")
Next by thread:
Re: Apt should be called "inapt" (rhymes with "inept")
Index(es):
Date
Thread