Re: state of mipsen cross toolchains
Hi Matthias,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 09:28:14PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> If you think, there is coordination needed, then you were probably not aware
> of dropping mips as a release architecture and not adding it as a port.
I'm sorry, my previous mail contained a very misleading typo. Where I
wrote "crossbuild-essential-mips", I actually meant
"crossbuild-essential-mipsel". No, I'm not trying to get "mips" back.
Due to this typo, your answer does not answer any of my questions. I'm
actually interested in the fate of the remaining release mipsen
architectures. Or maybe I'm missing plans to remove all mipsen as
release architectures?
> The move of the remaining two mips* targets to -cross-mipsen were
> coordinated with YunQiang Su, however I didn't expect him adding back mips.
It's great that you coordinated it with YunQiang Su. However
coordinating the development of cross toolchains with debian-cross would
seem to be a fairly obvious thing to do, no? Especially if your changes
render cross toolchains unusable for months.
Helmut
Reply to: