Bug#784973: gcc-4.9-arm-linux-gnueabi depends on obsolete libgcc-4.9-dev:armel (= 4.9.2-10) in sid
Package: gcc-4.9-arm-linux-gnueabi
Version: 4.9.2-10
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
% sudo apt-get install gcc-4.9-arm-linux-gnueabi
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
gcc-4.9-arm-linux-gnueabi : Depends: libgcc-4.9-dev:armel (= 4.9.2-10) but 4.9.2-16 is to be installed
% rmadison libgcc-4.9-dev:armel
libgcc-4.9-dev | 4.9.2-10 | stable | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
libgcc-4.9-dev | 4.9.2-10 | stable-kfreebsd | kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386
libgcc-4.9-dev | 4.9.2-10 | testing | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
libgcc-4.9-dev | 4.9.2-10 | unstable | sparc
libgcc-4.9-dev | 4.9.2-16 | buildd-unstable | kfreebsd-amd64
libgcc-4.9-dev | 4.9.2-16 | unstable | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386, armel
Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=2EP8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: