On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 07:31:29AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: [snip] And, there's some more explanation to do about my package. 1. There's a debian/patches directory, containing loads of patches. These are NOT useful. I was using that place as a scratch pad to split and individually tests Camm's monolithic blas.patch. 2. The debian/blas.patch is _heavily_ refactored and tailored to the new code. The old one, which Camm had made, is named blas.patch.old. 3. In the previous version, I talked about "suggesting a version". What I meant was a suggestion for the upstream version number. Right now, it is 1.2.new, but that isn't acceptable... Thanks! Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature