Re: gfortran transition release goal proposal
I suppose everyone is aware that -ffloat-store is a real performance
loser, especially on slower machines. Would it be preferable to fix
the testers to not be fooled by extra precision?
Riku Voipio <email@example.com> writes:
> your email is bounding for me!
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 06:14:46PM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
> > Sure. I suppose we still have testsuite failures in
> > blas/lapack/atlas, yes? I'll try to take a look. Is refblas3 as good
> > a place to start as any?
> you need to you -ffloat-store gfortran option. see man gcc-4.2 for
> exoplanation. With attached patch, I got refblas3 testsuite succeed
> on i386 and it was told to me that it also works for amd64.
> "rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups
Camm Maguire firstname.lastname@example.org
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah