[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: fw: gfortran transition release goal proposal

Riku Voipio wrote:
> Hi,
> The proposal to transition from the outdated g77 to gfortran did
> not result any comments. Which rises the suspicion that the maintainers
> of affected packages are not reading debian-release or debian-toolchain.
> If you have suggestions, critique, or you are busy but accept NMU'ing
> your packages for gfortran transition.. please speak now.

Hi Riku,

I did see it and it seemed very reasonable.  I am waiting to hear about
a suggested order in which the blas-depending packages should be uploaded.

Cernlib-related components can be uploaded in the following order once
blas, lapack (and ideally atlas) are taken care of:

mclibs / paw (these two are independent)
geant321 / mn-fit (these are independent but must each follow paw)

I'd prefer to do the uploads myself since these packages are rather finicky.

best regards,

Kevin B. McCarty <kmccarty@princeton.edu>   Physics Department
WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/    Princeton University
GPG: public key ID 4F83C751                 Princeton, NJ 08544

Reply to: