Re: Issues with shared libgcc
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 10:32:40PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Ben Collins writes:
> > Can we have a libgcc.so and a libgcc.a at the same time? If so can we
> > force all of the libs in glibc to link with the latter while binaries
> > link with libgcc.so?
>
> $ locate /libgcc
> /lib/libgcc_s.so.300
> /usr/doc/libgcc300
> /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.7.2.3/libgcc.a
> /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.3/libgcc.a
> /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.0/libgcc.a
> /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.0/libgcc_s.so
>
> Note that /lib/libgcc_s.so.300 is /lib/libgcc_s.so.0; I patched the
> scripts not to use upstream names until the ABI is frozen for 3.0.
Er, won't that cause problems for anything that links to it? Did you
change the SONAME?
Dan
/--------------------------------\ /--------------------------------\
| Daniel Jacobowitz |__| SCS Class of 2002 |
| Debian GNU/Linux Developer __ Carnegie Mellon University |
| dan@debian.org | | dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu |
\--------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/
Reply to: