Re: 2.95.3 and Debian patches to 2.95.2
On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> > There are several small libstdc++-v2 patches that seem fine and without
> > risk (get rid of warnings, throw exception instead of abort on out
> > of memory if STL malloc_alloc is used).
>
> These were submitted to the gcc-2.95.3 release manager.
So far I haven't applied those. I'm no C++ expert, and removing warnings
doesn't seem critical enough for me to risk breaking an area I don't
understand well.
BTW, Matthias, please back out the gcc-default-arch.dpatch; I used to think
it's a no-op but it's actually quite harmful.
Bernd
Reply to: