Bug#1024997: what kind of bug was it?

To: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
Cc: 1024997@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#1024997: what kind of bug was it?
From: Preuße@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar <hille42@web.de>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 23:35:06 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 567672e4-979e-e8d4-a0fe-6b091a943281@web.de>
Reply-to: Preuße@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar <hille42@web.de>, 1024997@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87edly91sy.dancerj-dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
References: <878rjvqgy4.fsf@tarsk.pearlmutter.net> <[🔎] 87edly91sy.dancerj-dancer@netfort.gr.jp> <878rjvqgy4.fsf@tarsk.pearlmutter.net>

On 26.06.2023 08:26, Junichi Uekawa wrote:

Hi Junichi,

From my guess it's some kind of buffer management issue; what was the
bug and is there a minimal fix ?

To be honest: I don't really care. I know the issue is solved in texinfo7.0.x, hence I perform no further investigation. Uploading TI 7.0 tounstable however will break a few packages [1], currently I'm waitingthat at least the new version of octave hits unstable.


If you think this could be a security issue, let me know.

Hilmar

[1]https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/bts-usertags.cgi?user=hille42%40web.de&tag=texinfo70

--
sigfault

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x0C871C4C653C1F59.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#1024997: what kind of bug was it?
  - From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

Prev by Date: Bug#1039976: detex.1: some remarks and editorial fixes in a patch for the manual
Next by Date: Bug#1035461: marked as done (texlive-binaries: Allow install of TeXlive without SSE2)
Previous by thread: Bug#1024997: what kind of bug was it?
Next by thread: Processing of context_2021.03.05.20230120+dfsg-1+deb12u1_source.changes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread