Bug#913542: marked as done (teckit: Fails to build on Ubuntu's ppc64el (symbols))

["Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>]

Your message dated Tue, 2 Feb 2021 08:13:08 +0100
with message-id <8c6a0749-683a-8e62-a168-a00f0409b55c@web.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#913542: teckit: Fails to build on Ubuntu's ppc64el (symbols)
has caused the Debian Bug report #913542,
regarding teckit: Fails to build on Ubuntu's ppc64el (symbols)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
913542: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=913542
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

--- Begin Message ---

• To: submit <submit@bugs.debian.org>
• Subject: teckit: Fails to build on Ubuntu's ppc64el (symbols)
• From: Jeremy Bicha <jbicha@debian.org>
• Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 21:12:25 -0500
• Message-id: <CAAajCMZw7AWUPHp+hYvwJvyEn5dnmo07oBn3whSesvrPO0Xg4A@mail.gmail.com>

Source: teckit
Version: 2.5.8+ds2-5
Severity: important

teckit fails to build on Ubuntu's ppc64el because the symbols don't
match. A few symbols are added and several are missing.

Notably, Ubuntu's ppc64el uses -O3 by default which occasionally leads
to symbols differences compared to all other release architectures
which default to -O2.

Build log:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/teckit/2.5.8+ds2-5/+build/15640076

Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha

--- End Message ---

--- Begin Message ---

• To: 913542-done@bugs.debian.org
• Subject: Re: Bug#913542: teckit: Fails to build on Ubuntu's ppc64el (symbols)
• From: Hilmar Preuße <hille42@web.de>
• Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 08:13:08 +0100
• Message-id: <8c6a0749-683a-8e62-a168-a00f0409b55c@web.de>
• In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAAVfK4vTazwDciMGeenmrGRoNp+nu9YcEaVPqVzB78TDNsbibQ@mail.gmail.com>
• References: <CAAajCMZw7AWUPHp+hYvwJvyEn5dnmo07oBn3whSesvrPO0Xg4A@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] CAAVfK4vTazwDciMGeenmrGRoNp+nu9YcEaVPqVzB78TDNsbibQ@mail.gmail.com>

Version: 2.5.10+ds1-3

Am 02.02.2021 um 06:14 teilte Logan Rosen mit:

Hi,

On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:17:41 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?Hilmar_Preu=c3=9fe?=
<hille42@web.de> wrote:

We stopped provide a symbols files, instead we use shlibs now. Does that
eventually solve your issue? Remove the tag patch for now.

Yes, I just synced 2.5.10+ds1-3 into Ubuntu, and I can confirm that it
builds successfully on ppc64el.

Closing then.

Hilmar
--
sigfault

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--- End Message ---