[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#926642: marked as done (texlive-binaries: "dvipdfmx ignores -m option")



Your message dated Thu, 19 Sep 2019 02:58:04 +0000
with message-id <E1iAmdw-00052i-Kg@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#926642: fixed in texlive-bin 2019.20190605.51237-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #926642,
regarding texlive-binaries: "dvipdfmx ignores -m option"
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
926642: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=926642
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: texlive-binaries
Version: 2018.20181218.49446-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

dvipdfmx in texlive-binaries_2018.20180907.48586-2_amd64.deb works well 
with "-m option".

However, dvipdfmx in texlive-binaries_2018.20181104.49075-1_amd64.deb 
and later igonres "-m option".


*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?
   * What was the outcome of this action?
   * What outcome did you expect instead?

*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***


-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN
Locale: LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=ja_JP.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages texlive-binaries depends on:
ii  dpkg              1.19.6
ii  install-info      6.5.0.dfsg.1-4+b1
ii  libbrotli1        1.0.7-2
ii  libc6             2.28-8
ii  libcairo2         1.16.0-4
ii  libfontconfig1    2.13.1-2
ii  libfreetype6      2.9.1-3
ii  libgcc1           1:8.3.0-5
ii  libgmp10          2:6.1.2+dfsg-4
ii  libgraphite2-3    1.3.13-7
ii  libgs9            9.26a~dfsg-2
ii  libharfbuzz-icu0  2.3.1-1
ii  libharfbuzz0b     2.3.1-1
ii  libice6           2:1.0.9-2
ii  libicu63          63.1-6
ii  libkpathsea6      2018.20181218.49446-1
ii  libmpfr6          4.0.2-1
ii  libpaper1         1.1.26
ii  libpixman-1-0     0.36.0-1
ii  libpng16-16       1.6.36-5
ii  libpotrace0       1.15-1
ii  libptexenc1       2018.20181218.49446-1
ii  libsm6            2:1.2.3-1
ii  libstdc++6        8.3.0-5
ii  libsynctex2       2018.20181218.49446-1
ii  libteckit0        2.5.8+ds2-5
ii  libtexlua52       2018.20181218.49446-1
ii  libtexlua53       2018.20181218.49446-1
ii  libtexluajit2     2018.20181218.49446-1
ii  libwoff1          1.0.2-1
ii  libx11-6          2:1.6.7-1
ii  libxaw7           2:1.0.13-1+b2
ii  libxext6          2:1.3.3-1+b2
ii  libxi6            2:1.7.9-1
ii  libxmu6           2:1.1.2-2+b2
ii  libxpm4           1:3.5.12-1
ii  libxt6            1:1.1.5-1+b2
ii  libxxhash0        0.6.5-2
ii  libzzip-0-13      0.13.62-3.2
ii  perl              5.28.1-6
ii  t1utils           1.41-3
ii  tex-common        6.11
ii  zlib1g            1:1.2.11.dfsg-1

Versions of packages texlive-binaries recommends:
ii  texlive-base  2018.20190227-2

texlive-binaries suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: texlive-bin
Source-Version: 2019.20190605.51237-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
texlive-bin, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 926642@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Norbert Preining <norbert@preining.info> (supplier of updated texlive-bin package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 17:15:44 +0900
Source: texlive-bin
Architecture: source
Version: 2019.20190605.51237-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian TeX Maintainers <debian-tex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Norbert Preining <norbert@preining.info>
Closes: 772928 890734 926642 926701 931873 940191
Changes:
 texlive-bin (2019.20190605.51237-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Hilmar Preusse ]
   * Stop building dvisvgm package to solve FTBFS on HURD
     (Closes: #926701). It will be packaged separately (see #932968).
     Add the new package to Recommends.
   * Add patch to pdftex.man to document -synctex option (Closes: #772928).
   * Patch by Gero Treuner <gt_72_debian.org@innocircle.com> (mp.w_epoch.patch)
     MetaPost does not honour SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH (Closes: #890734).
   * Patch by John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
     (sparc64-fix-alignment.patch) to enable the alignment fixes for Linux on
     SPARC64 (Closes: #931873).
 .
   [ Norbert Preining ]
   * Cherry pick session:
     - lacheck: separate patterns for handling \def and \newcommand
     - lacheck: version bump 1.29
     - ptex: strict '! Improper alphabetic or KANJI constant.'
     - eptex: version 190709 (add \ifincsname, revise \iffontchar and \fontchar)
     - eptex.ech: more compatible with original e-TeX
     - xdvi: don't use now-gone-from-ghostscript execute operator (from upstream)
       (Closes: #940191)
     - dvipdfmx: Fix a crash observed in add_ligature1_inverse_map()
     - dvipdfmx: Fix a bug that OTL coverage data were sometimes not
       read and were initialized to wrong values.
     - dvipdfmx: Fix evaluation of option "-m" (Closes: #926642)
     - dvipdfmx: workaround for problems in user defined resources
     - gsftopk: gs-9.28(rc1) requires -dNOSAFER
     - dvipdfmx: Take into account summertime. Always output color change code
     - dvipdfmx: show appropriate message if unsupported pfa is used
     - e-pTeX: e-pTeX 190908: \readline correctly handles Japanese characters
     - ptexenc.c: updates from H. Kitagawa
Checksums-Sha1:
 6dfd17c9110845aaf03e7e46d981a3ae3a0cec8f 2952 texlive-bin_2019.20190605.51237-3.dsc
 1afe6b2f21318f759a27bb170b066960d9a9a86a 109848 texlive-bin_2019.20190605.51237-3.debian.tar.xz
 5c1c7ff88ae6044a7e7a468e75b307ffdf239c2b 11727 texlive-bin_2019.20190605.51237-3_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 0ea3ded2817a1e2afe80faaf9218b716c090acb532934a3ca416cf115d2c2081 2952 texlive-bin_2019.20190605.51237-3.dsc
 1d507619b0bb6f16dd9aa2a71bcc36397759bf082961ffe6973d36fed5f7c73a 109848 texlive-bin_2019.20190605.51237-3.debian.tar.xz
 548b661009e63284a90ff5e4b320773c1a6d6712b1164a27b163966178dc493e 11727 texlive-bin_2019.20190605.51237-3_source.buildinfo
Files:
 fc553cc5e27bab2030f9bf7d753f08c8 2952 tex optional texlive-bin_2019.20190605.51237-3.dsc
 d1782a8e0314348e61ff557c5f58ccf0 109848 tex optional texlive-bin_2019.20190605.51237-3.debian.tar.xz
 4c74b6d94e0e553435599620b240bf40 11727 tex optional texlive-bin_2019.20190605.51237-3_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEE68ws0vrA2voQX53I2A4JsIcUAGYFAl2C4YEACgkQ2A4JsIcU
AGYGcgf+LJjpQHvR78FqMRmq5+KOxc92juUbX1YRKmB1f8v6FiN5at7a+Kmvus9Q
BSFA0+5i2BhOP1G+IzggLtIanTH9bCZZLE3PjGxll6KKoOdVPvhMBjiQLd+qxaJG
s1tkeGdK0e6deqF2prwQg2pQQ/wIi+c/f9n7vA/suaC0UHTaA+DqwbLHJMFolww6
4SN2qB8GUzPz1CDV3ySbNu1l6FRzW8FrNywQCnbAQhpEsYVBFiX2EtLy/I3BxInw
p/bddiOYFwP78t6mriE51yuJVC4yxjZhhn/kxmQT1ZEB7k3PpyWvTr5iF2LrRk02
m9tZk3NSueHM3eKwhUpkS2RfKqYkDQ==
=zIdE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply to: