[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#689007: marked as done (/usr/share/doc/texlive-latex-base-doc/latex/base/ltnews.pdf: Issue 2011/06 issue differs from upstream)

Your message dated Sun, 5 May 2019 23:29:54 +0200
with message-id <69414f86-6f55-a67f-52b3-f5df54d7382f@web.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#689007: /usr/share/doc/texlive-latex-base-doc/latex/base/ltnews.pdf: Issue 2011/06 issue differs from upstream
has caused the Debian Bug report #689007,
regarding /usr/share/doc/texlive-latex-base-doc/latex/base/ltnews.pdf: Issue 2011/06 issue differs from upstream
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
689007: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689007
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: texlive-latex-base-doc
Version: 2012.20120611-4
Severity: normal
File: /usr/share/doc/texlive-latex-base-doc/latex/base/ltnews.pdf


In the ltnews.pdf file the issue 20, 2011/06 differs from

http://www.latex-project.org/ltnews/ltnews20.pdf

in particular in the code from varioref in the end.
The latter mentions an additional failed attempt,
so I assume that it is more up-to-date.

Best wishes,

	Gábor Braun

PS. System information omitted as irrelevant.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 28.09.12 09:50, Braun Gábor wrote:

Hi Gábor,

> File: /usr/share/doc/texlive-latex-base-doc/latex/base/ltnews.pdf
> 
> In the ltnews.pdf file the issue 20, 2011/06 differs from
> 
> http://www.latex-project.org/ltnews/ltnews20.pdf
> 
> in particular in the code from varioref in the end.
> The latter mentions an additional failed attempt,
> so I assume that it is more up-to-date.
> 
I compared the current ltnews w/ the one from the web page. It just
differs in the \vspace, but I guess this is not your point.

Closing this bug.

Hilmar
-- 
sigfault
#206401 http://counter.li.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: