Bug#721626: texlive-base: .pfm files really needed?

To: Hilmar Preuße <hille42@web.de>
Cc: 721626@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#721626: texlive-base: .pfm files really needed?
From: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 06:46:25 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 20190804214625.tmgvuxkdotnias3r@burischnitzel.preining.info>
Reply-to: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>, 721626@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] d005e0a3-0cb5-12dc-fb29-2dd23bd050b8@web.de>
References: <20130902141555.22328.35272.reportbug@kff50.ghi.rwth-aachen.de> <20130902143611.GB5226@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <[🔎] d005e0a3-0cb5-12dc-fb29-2dd23bd050b8@web.de> <20130902141555.22328.35272.reportbug@kff50.ghi.rwth-aachen.de>

On Sun, 04 Aug 2019, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> hille@debian-amd64-sid:~$ apt-file search .pfm|grep texlive|wc -l
> 567
> 
> Need help here? Simply blacklisting in
> texlive-nonbin/all/debian/tpm2deb.cfg ?

Yes, that should be fine. Probably some patterns would be nice.

Best

Norbert

--
PREINING Norbert                               http://www.preining.info
Accelia Inc. + IFMGA ProGuide + TU Wien + JAIST + TeX Live + Debian Dev
GPG: 0x860CDC13   fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#721626: texlive-base: .pfm files really needed?
  - From: Hilmar Preuße <hille42@web.de>

Prev by Date: Bug#772928: [pdftex] Add option -synctex to pdftex(1)
Next by Date: Re: Found in source code of MetaPOST
Previous by thread: Bug#721626: texlive-base: .pfm files really needed?
Next by thread: Bug#618033: marked as done (texlive-bin-2009: Missing -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 leads to files not opening (x86 /32bit))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread