[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#868939: texlive-fonts-extra: please, use alternative depends on ttf-adf- packages that are now fonts-adf-



Hi, Norbert.

Sorry for not replying earlier, but I've been very busy with real world
duties and having so many health checks and screening.

On Jul 22 2017, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2017, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > > Can you change the depends on ttf-adf-* fonts to be (at least) alternative
> > > depends on fonts-adf-* packages?
> > 
> > Are the two shipping the same fonts?

As far as I can tell, yes, they supply the same files, all in truetype and
in otf containers. The fonts in fonts-adf-* are newer also (potentially with
more glyphs and/or corrections).

> > And if yes, why isn't ttf-adf-* not a transitional package depending on
> > fonts-adf-?

Hummm, that I don't know, as it's been quite some time since I last worked
on the fonts team.

> > I can surely change the deps, but since I link the fonts into the
> > TeX Live tree so that hte adf latex packages work, I need to be sure
> > that the fonts actually agree and work?

I couldn't test if they work yet. I can break the dependencies here to test
(the packages install the fonts at the same locations). Also, the fonts-*
packages have the breaks, conflicts, replaces, provides with the respective
ttf-* packages.

So, at least, some transition work has been done and the fonts-* packages
are both in unstable and testing.


Thanks,

-- 
Rogério Brito : rbrito@{ime.usp.br,gmail.com} : GPG key 4096R/BCFCAAAA
http://cynic.cc/blog/ : github.com/rbrito : profiles.google.com/rbrito
DebianQA: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=rbrito%40ime.usp.br


Reply to: