[texlive-bin] 02/04: try to build upmendex again on all archs
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
preining pushed a commit to branch master
in repository texlive-bin.
commit e667cce0b709d2fc8fd3944a9431c075a9277d5d
Author: Norbert Preining <preining@debian.org>
Date: Mon Jun 20 10:19:09 2016 +0900
try to build upmendex again on all archs
---
debian/changelog | 3 ++-
debian/rules | 5 +----
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index aab9ebf..e735636 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
texlive-bin (2016.20160513.41080-4) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
* fix for upmendex segfaults (upstream svn 41497 and 41498)
+ - reactivate upmendex building for all archs
- -- Norbert Preining <preining@debian.org> Mon, 20 Jun 2016 10:17:24 +0900
+ -- Norbert Preining <preining@debian.org> Mon, 20 Jun 2016 10:19:20 +0900
texlive-bin (2016.20160513.41080-3) unstable; urgency=medium
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index 2f54da1..efd9499 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ export CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/sh
LUAJIT_GOOD_ARCHS := amd64 armel armhf hurd-i386 i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 powerpc
#
-# architectures where icu related programs (upmendex, xetex) have problems
+# architectures where icu related programs (xetex) have problems
# and core dump etc. Possible fix, but sub-optimal because slowing down
# programs
BROKEN_ICU_ARCHS := mips mipsel sparc64
@@ -47,9 +47,7 @@ endif
ifneq (,$(findstring $(DEB_HOST_ARCH), $(BROKEN_ICU_ARCHS)))
export CFLAGS += -DU_IS_BIG_ENDIAN=0
export CXXFLAGS += -DU_IS_BIG_ENDIAN=0
- BUILDUPMENDEX=--disable-upmendex
else
- BUILDUPMENDEX=--enable-upmendex
endif
@@ -143,7 +141,6 @@ override_dh_auto_configure:
--with-mf-x-toolkit \
--with-xdvi-x-toolkit=xaw \
$(BUILDLUAJITTEX) \
- $(BUILDUPMENDEX) \
--disable-lcdf-typetools \
--disable-biber \
--disable-dvipng \
--
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/debian-tex/texlive-bin.git
Reply to: