Re: RE:Asymptote updates and git repository
Hi Frédéric,
thanks for your answer!
> it is true that asymptote is closely related toTex :).
Well then ..
> Now I packaged symptote 2.24, but I did not upload it due to problem. with this versionI can not produce my figures.
2.24 is broken, that is the reason I only went to 2.23 which
I have packaged. Please try the packaged version or build from source.
> I amwondering if the problemis not a bad interraction with osmesa ?
I tried some 3d graphics and other graphics and all of them worked.
> Just a few remark do you plan to backport asymptote ?
No, I don't do backports.
> I yes I think that it would be better to stick with python-imaging instead of python-pil.
Not possible, as asymptote *expects* PIL already. Fom xasy2asy for
example:
# PIL support is now mandatory due to rotations
try:
from PIL import ImageTk
from PIL import Image
except:
pass
> your get-orig-source target repack the original tarball and remove some files but keep the original tarballname.
> Does it correspond to the 2.23 version uploaded into you git repository ?
Yes, the orig.tar that is checked into the .git in the debian-tex
git repo is the repackaged one.
THe reason for the repackaging is that otherwise
git-buildpackage
cannot work, as the clean target removes the files and git-buildpackage
complains about it (Sure I can add --ignore-new etc, etc, but I don't
like that).
> > * Debian TeX Maintainers
> > move the package under to hood of the debian-tex-maint, change
> > maintainer, git etc etc, keep us all in the uploaders,
> > grant you and Frédéric write access to the debian-tex group
>
> I am fine with this proposition.
Ok, so I wait for the final ok from Hubert and then go forth.
Thanks a lot
Norbert
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: